Thoughts on writing, reading, life, and philosophy

Archive for the Philosophy Category

Are You Predisposed to Like What You Choose to Read?

I’ve been thinking about this on and off for a long while, but the question still bugs me. When I pick a book out of my TBR pile and open the first page, I start with the assumption that I have this book for a good reason. That could be because the premise caught my eye, because I like the author, because someone recommended it to me, or even because I won it in a contest. The reason doesn’t matter. I assume it’s not there at random, and therefore I wanted to read it. Okay, it’s a sign of the extent of my TBR pile (1.5 bookcases and growing) that I can’t always remember why a book is there. This may be part of the reason I approach things as I do, but even when I was gobbling down 20+ books a week, I approached them looking for what this one offered me as opposed to demanding entertainment.

(more…)

Social Media and the Coffee House

I was at a restaurant with my husband last night and we started talking about social media, specifically the differences between Twitter and Facebook. Something clicked for me, and I thought I’d share what I figured out.

My parents are both retired Foreign Service officers which means that I spent much of my childhood surrounded by reams of fascinating adults. This included other diplomats, company folks stationed in the same country, ex-pats often from Ireland, or any number of other folks who had chosen to live outside their native country, or who were native to the country we were currently in. I learned quite young how to behave among them so I wasn’t sent to bed early, though before that I would hide under the dining room table so I could still listen. (more…)

How to Enjoy Life

I come before you today bruised and battered, scabbed and turning colors. The most important decoration on my body? It’s the smile on my face. I’ve posted canary posts before about odd incidents where things went out of control, but this isn’t a canary post. In fact, it’s pretty much the opposite of a canary post.

When I was a kid, I was fearless. I didn’t let broad waters, high cliffs, or even revolutionaries stand in the way of getting out and doing things. I fell down not one but at least two of those cliffs. I once bicycled from the outskirts into downtown Athens, Greece because I didn’t understand how hand brakes worked on a borrowed bike. What did I do then? I got my bearings and pedaled back home as soon as I’d slowed down. Hey, you can get going really fast when you go down Devil’s Hill (our name for it) without knowing how to brake). I back-pedaled my heart out, but nothing ever happened.) Still, I didn’t panic. I treated it like an adventure.
(more…)

What Steampunk Is to Me

If you’ve been reading my blog for a while, you’ll find the statement that I enjoy Steampunk a little obvious, but I learned as I read Windup Girl by Paolo Bacigalupi that I have a very clear sense of what Steampunk is to me.

I have devoured the current Steampunk trend, delighting in the innovative designs and the literary analysis of the phenomenon. I can’t tell you how many attempts to define Steampunk I’ve read over the past couple of years. A recent one stuck with me, though, because it was a tirade against Steampunk design, a rather articulate analysis of how changing your laptop, etc. to look Victorian with a mechanical brass edge actually goes against everything Steampunk stands for. I didn’t blog it because I prefer positive over negative, and have now lost the link, but it clearly had more of an impact with me than I’d expected (had I known, I would have blogged it, negative or not).

So why, you might ask, do I feel the need–nay, the urge–to offer up my own definition of Steampunk? Well, because I’m curious about whether others feel as I do, and because, having thought it out, I want to share.
(more…)

Stages of Readers: A Manifesto

Last night I went to see a high school performance of a play that I have now seen three times, A Servant of Two Masters. This is not a major play like Cats, and I hadn’t sought it out, but coincidence or what have you led me to seeing this same play multiple times. The first time was at a community theater in Alameda, California, enough years ago that I didn’t remember having seen it until the events in the play the second time were too familiar to be dismissed. The second performance was last year on a school trip (you bet I volunteered ;) ) to Ashland, Oregon to see a portion of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival that is ongoing there. And the third, as I mentioned, was a local high school. (more…)

The Gnostic Mystery by Randy Davila

(Crossposted on LibraryThing)

In a quote on the back of the book, The Gnostic Mystery is put in the same category as The Da Vinci Code so it’s no wonder that I was expecting a fast-paced mystery thriller. I find what I consider false advertising a sad thing because it could turn away people who would find this book fascinating, while making those who do stop to pick it up feel mislead.

Luckily, I read with a very broad mind so when the book turned out to be much different than my expectations, I accepted what had come into my hands as a mystery of a different sort, a book whose purpose and focus remained to be discovered.

Randy Davila does offer a story in this novel, though to call that tale a mystery is a bit of a stretch to my mind. The true mystery has nothing to do with the story itself, but rather is a voyage in which two characters explore what religion in general and Christianity in specific means to them personally and how that meaning is strengthened or changed by new understandings that unfold as they interact with a religious scholar and her colleague. These characters are brought together by a chance purchase of an ancient Gnostic scroll that opens new vistas for the main character and his friend.

The book itself is a thinly disguised thesis on the history of early Christianity and the Gnostic movement. The material is presented by Chloe, a professor of philosophy and religion in Jerusalem, who is asked to translate the scroll initially as a first move in the dating ritual. But soon this quest for answers becomes so much more than that as the foundation of Jack’s and Punjeeh’s understanding of Christianity is undermined.

Jack goes to Israel to visit his friend and come to terms with the emptiness he’s found in his life. He expects to find the answers in the historical roots of the religion he was brought up in but which never quite captured his imagination. His friend and former college roommate has always been a devout Christian and so seems a reasonable guide. However, Jack soon learns Punjeeh has set aside the trappings of Christianity if not the teachings because he is horrified about what is being done in religion’s name in the conflict between Arabs and Jews. As an Emergency Room doctor, he gets to see first hand the damage done to uphold different religious views.

The scroll and Chloe’s explanations of both the Gnostic beliefs and what little is known about their historical presence challenge Jack and Punjeeh to question what they’ve always been told. They explore a different conceptualization of Jesus’ life and the historical events accepted as true in the Bible, guided by Chloe’s spoon feeding so that their worlds are not shaken so much all at once that they respond emotionally as opposed to considering the information for its value.

Rather than a quest for external treasure, this novel explores the religious beliefs and philosophies of the characters, offering information rarely considered outside of a scholarly environment and adamantly opposed by some Christian leaders, in a fiction framework that allows the reader to consider not only the revelations, but also the characters’ reactions. I think Davila did a good job of making the characters likable and revealing the information in small enough doses that though I could see the thesis aspect, the characters kept me wanting to see their journey through in a way no academic text could have, even if I read it for the information alone.

In case you doubt my interpretation, at the end of the book are discussion questions worthy of any advanced literature or philosophy course concerning both symbolism within the text and your own positions regarding the information presented to the characters. The marketing may attempt to disguise its scholarly nature, but the study guide supports the author’s apparent intent to educate.

Overall, I found The Gnostic Mystery fascinating. I’m a bit of an amateur philosopher and now I have to wonder where, in my rather unorthodox Catholic upbringing, I was exposed to Gnostic principles. The thoughts attributed to them here match rather well with my own religious ponderings, which seems an unlikely coincidence.

As a novelist, I feel Davila still has some growth to do. The balance between the thesis material and the tale that provided a vehicle was a little off, the resolutions too easy. Israel and Palestine provide a rich backdrop for these types of questions. I think the novel could have taken advantage of that fact more to build the narrative, and make the story as rich as the Gnostic discussions. However, this is his first novel-length work. Should he spend more time on the story in the future, and learn how to develop the complexity necessary for a novel plot, I think he will be able to offer many interesting works that explore philosophy and religion through the eyes of characters rich enough to avoid the lectures but reveal the same content.

Friday’s Interesting Links

For those that are curious, my links come from a variety of sources. I get some on Twitter, others from the various forums and listservs I belong to, still more from emails and newsletters, not to mention the ones pointed out by friends and family, as well as those discovered in my own meandering through the web. These are only an excerpt of the volume I read and assess, but these are the ones I thought others might find interesting. By the way, though I categorize, just because you might not be a writer, for example, doesn’t mean the things I am bringing to your attention are without interest to a broader population. Give it a try, then tell me what you thought in the comments.

Science

What does Alaska and the Moon have in common?
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/03apr_lunarlifestyle.htm?list868465

Writing

Client perspective on agents
http://kellygay.blogspot.com/2009/04/agent-win-agent-fail-clients.html

Positive fallout from queryfail/agentfail
http://litsoup.blogspot.com/2009/04/nameless-faceless.html

http://gretchenmcneil.blogspot.com/2009/04/agentfail-response-from-non-failing.html

A look at how a publicist works
http://heydeadguy.typepad.com/heydeadguy/2009/04/whats-a-publicist-worth.html

Laura Anne Gilman on outlining for editors
http://community.livejournal.com/fangs_fur_fey/471769.html

What Dollhouse can teach
http://theswivet.blogspot.com/2009/04/what-joss-whedons-dollhouse-can-teach.html

Insight into editors’ interest
http://chronicle.com/jobs/news/2009/04/2009040601c.htm?utm_source=at&utm_medium=en

Agent’s thoughts on book doctors (mixed into the post)
http://queryshark.blogspot.com/2009/04/108.html

Unpublished romance novel contest
http://www.charteroakromancewriters.org/contests.html

What an agent’s job actually is
http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2009/04/06/agents-and-rejection/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2009/apr/08/literary-agents-use

First Novels
http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/first_novels_belong_in_the_basement_against_self_publishing/C39/L39/

Social Networking

Thoughts on blog audience
http://acewriters.com/?p=122

Twittered out?
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/internetlife/2009-04-08-sociability-fatigue_N.htm?csp=DailyBriefing

Reading

Article about the impact of fiction in life
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123880307592488761.html

Thoughts on eReaders and the future
http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/22/kindle-oreilly-ebooks-technology-breakthroughs_oreilly.html

General
A blast from the past
http://www.timeagan.com/MT/Subconscious%20Comics/

Sharing Chores?
http://necktiesandtattoos.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-june-and-ward-cleaver-might-have.html

Deadly Pancakes?
http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/pancake.asp

Whether you agree with the political bit at the end, I think the overall social message here is a critical one:
http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/bregman/2009/04/harness-the-power-of-apology.html?cm_re=homepage-031909-_-body-middle-tert-_-voices

The Not To Do List
http://michaelhyatt.com/2007/01/the-not-to-do-list.html

YouTube Education
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2009-04-09-college-youtube_N.htm?csp=Tech

Pedestrian

pedestrian \puh-DES-tree-uhn\, noun, adjective:

1. a person who gets about on foot; walker
2. going on foot; walking
3. without imagination; dull

I got the above in my email from Dictionary.com’s Word of the Day this morning, and the third entry struck me as odd. What does it say about our culture as reflected in our language that self-locomotion is something to be scorned?

When my boys were younger, we used to walk for exercise, to get out, to experience the world, and to talk without distraction. We had wonderful conversations about life, the universe, and everything; we played imagination games as we stalked the deadly Stopasaurus but failed to find anything but the occasional octagonal red prints; and the boys helped me brainstorm my stories, introducing interesting elements or just getting me to think things through.

Pedestrian? Well yes, except for when one of them was in a stroller.

But pedestrian? I can’t imagine a description less adequate or more inappropriate than “without imagination; dull.” To this day, I remember those times fondly and miss them.

Since moving to Nevada, I have taken up walking again, by myself or with my husband this time as my boys are too busy with their own lives.

As I walk, responsible for nothing but putting one foot in front of the other, I work out story problems, get past programming limitations, muse on my world, and sing along to my MP3 player. And that’s not even considering the natural beauty all around me with ducks of more varieties than I knew existed, the ever-present (though migratory ;) ) Canada Geese, the two herons who are never seen together, the swooping hawks, occasional eagles, and numerous smaller birds, including the laughable hat bob on the heads of quail.

So then I go to Online Etymology Dictionary (http://www.etymonline.com/) and find this:

pedestrian (adj.)
1716, “prosaic, dull” (of writing), from L. pedester (gen. pedestris) “plain, prosaic” (sense contrasted with equester “on horseback”), from pedes “one who goes on foot,” from pes (gen. pedis) “foot” (see foot). Meaning “going on foot” is first attested 1791 in Eng. (it was also a sense of L. pedester). The noun meaning “walker” is 1793, from the adj.

If I’m reading this correctly, the dull meaning, though contrasted with on horseback, predates the walking meaning by some 70+ years. I’d be willing to concede the physical act of walking, the putting one foot in front of the other, has little to recommend it compared to a wild charge across a desert valley on horseback, but I’d question whether a walking pace on a horse would be any more thrilling, any less…umm…pedestrian :) .

And if all you’re doing when walking is the physical act, might I suggest you’re missing a grand opportunity. Now I would not go so far as to recommend my older sister’s practice of crossing busy streets with her head in a book, but there’s a lot of things you can do when walking that are not recommended for other modes of locomotion. No one is going to pass a “no walking on the cell phone” ban, nor is arguing with a friend (friendly discussion now! ;) ) as likely to result in a potentially serious accident.

With all this talk of the pedestrian act, I think I’ll leave you now to go out into the sunshine I can see through the window. Perhaps today I will actually catch the two herons at once. It hasn’t happened in over two years, but I keep looking while committing a pedestrian act.

In the Name of Good… and Announcements

I believe there’s a lot of cross over between my blog readers and the community of writers, so I thought you might be interested in the following announcements:

First of all, I edit the review section and write a couple columns for Vision: A Resource for Writers. This is a wonderful online magazine that provides articles on markets, writing techniques, resources useful to writers, and interviews among other elements. It is also a market for beginning non-fiction writers, and pulls on a wide variety of experienced writers for articles and interviews. Most of the content focuses on fiction writing of any genre, but articles on non-fiction topics do appear and are welcome. If you haven’t checked it out before, please do. And if you have, you’ll be happy to hear the new issue has been posted.

www.lazette.net/vision

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The second item is primarily for fiction writers. I am teaching an online workshop on non-verbal communication: how to become conscious of its influence and how to use it in your writing. The course does require membership in Forward Motion (a wonderful writing community), but membership is free. This requirement is to preserve rights for any work you might complete during the class.

I give fair warning that my workshops are intensive, but the more work you put in, the more you get out of the workshops.

Please come and check it out at fmwriters.com. After you log in, click on the Learning Center 2009 link in the header and then go to the Workshops 2009 folder.

The workshop begins on January 5th and the class will run 6 weeks.

Hope to see you there.



For the stray thought, I give you this…how many social restrictions do we pass on to our kids in the effort to protect their childhood?

This question struck me when reading an article in a 2003 Smithsonian (yes, I’m behind, but they’re still as good now as then, and sometimes more interesting with what’s happened since). It was an article about the Blackfoot language, and efforts to recover the language and the cultural aspects it contains through an immersion school. While that, in itself, is interesting, what really caught my eye was how the language dwindled in the first place.

The article explains that the tribe’s children two generations back were shipped to English-only schools where the penalty for speaking anything other than English was harsh. These children came back to their reservations with the understanding that speaking Blackfoot meant being beaten, so they made sure their children wouldn’t suffer the same fate by discouraging any use of their own language. In one generation, the number of native speakers was reduced to almost nothing first by the treatment in the schools and then by honest efforts to protect children.

Okay, that’s horrible, but has no direct impact on me seeing as English is my native language, except…

The day before, I went with my husband to Home Depot to pick up some plastic zip ties to attach a mile counter to my son’s bike (his Christmas present was missing some key, but easily obtainable, pieces). We had to ask for help to find the zip ties, and the Home Depot employee tagged along.

We turned the corner to see a bag of zip ties in the delightful colors of neon yellow, green, and of course, pink. I pointed them out to the man and my husband, laughing at the unexpected colors. The man commented that black plastic holds up best outdoors, a handy little tip I now pass to you.

It was a slow night and so he hung about as we contemplated the extensive display. My husband had hoped to pick up a bulk pack with a variety of sizes, but the options were white, and of course, the neon collection. After the man’s comment about black, neither were suitable, but I jokingly said that we should get the neon pink for our teenager as this would go over very well. We all laughed at the shared cultural joke, then we picked up straight black both for the longer duration and the social safety.

All well and good so far, but now that article has me thinking.

In as late as a 1918 Ladies Home Journal, mothers were advised to dress their boys in pink to be in fashion, presumably because it was a bright, dramatic color. It’s not until the 1940s that the modern gender association became common. And yet, a boy who wears pink in most modern US cultures will be subject to ridicule or worse.

That attitude is clear enough in the joke I myself made even though I normally scoff at the biased linking of specific colors to gender. In the case of my kids though, I do what’s necessary to reduce the chance of them getting bullied, something they’ve been at risk for since the beginning because, frankly, their parents are out of step culturally. What I hadn’t realized was how much I’d absorbed those cues in the context of my kids.

And now I have to rethink my position.

Not that pink being lost as boys’ wear is a big cultural failure, not that a people’s history will vanish because of this bias against pink, but even such a small thing makes me wonder.

I don’t want my kids to be subject to ridicule, isolated by their peers, or beaten up after school as I was myself. I know that governs my choices not just of clothing but in other aspects of their lives. I give them a good foundation, or try, and then point out where they need to be cautious and protect themselves.

Do you have any idea how difficult it is to raise kids to be aware and respectful of people who are different than themselves while at the same time encouraging them to act like everyone else to protect them? When what makes them unique also makes them vulnerable, how do you balance sheltering them and encouraging them to be themselves.

When my mother-in-law got the boys wind cheaters ages ago, she was startled to see them choose hot pink. Why did they? Probably because my wind cheater was hot pink (a color I happen to adore for its ability to be bright and cheery when we were living in a place that rarely got real sun) and they hadn’t yet picked up on that being a no-no color for boys.

My youngest doesn’t care about pink. Sometimes he even likes to wear it. When I caution against, he says he doesn’t care what people think. Part of me is proud of him. The rest is worried.

This is the same son that I joked about getting the pink zip ties and then chose not to.

So what other social conventions that I don’t believe in have I unwittingly supported in the interests of my children? What haven’t I told them to make sure they didn’t say it in other company where such attitudes would be greeted with a harsh response, whether by the authorities or their peers? In what ways have I helped the destruction of what makes our culture and my kids unique by avoiding or actively squashing things?

I don’t know whether it’s comforting that I can’t think of any big example, or terrifying. By pure luck have I only had to compromise on the little things, or has compromise in this context become so common that even something big slips my notice? I know something important to me would not have, but there are a lot of things outside my radar that, when given notice, are clearly making a statement I don’t intend. When that does happen I correct the impression, but who’s there to give notice if each generation aids and abets the whitewashing of culture for purely good reasons?

Scary thoughts, don’t you think?

The Last Lecture and Life Lessons

Sorry for the long silence, though this may actually explain some of it :) .

As some of you may know, I spent the past year under a knife, figurative, but possibly literal, with a severe medical condition that no one could explain. It’s made me think about things a lot, though most of that pondering got swallowed up by the pain/pain med-induced amnesia :p.

Now with that context, you might think the fact that both my sisters recommended The Last Lecture by Randy Pausch to be particularly ominous, but it’s actually a coincidence. I had heard about the last lecture and stuck it in my head under physicists saying fascinating things. Yes, I know now that Randy Pausch is not a physicist, nor is he talking much about science. But that was enough to make me interested when, at a family reunion, I noticed my older sister was reading this book. She’d borrowed it from my younger sister, who then both recommended I read The Last Lecture and allowed me to borrow her copy as well.

So I got back from the reunion to discover that what we’d thought had resolved (in three wonderful, mostly symptom-free weeks) was back. The upshot of it was that I now faced a surgery to cure me instead of either being already cured or under a death sentence. Still, my frame of mind over the course of this past year had certain similarities to Randy Pausch.

Anyway, between preparing for the surgery and after, a small book with little chapters seemed the perfect read. I knew my focus could be measured in minutes, not hours, so a normal book would take too long. Except that I didn’t read just a page at a time.

The Last Lecture is neither about physics (or virtual reality, his actual area of expertise ;) ) nor so much about dying. It’s a collection of thoughts and stories about how Randy Pausch lived his life, what he learned about people along the way, and what lessons he wants to pass on to his children, along with anyone else interested enough to listen. The book is surprisingly optimistic while being very grounded in the reality of his timeline. He focuses on the people whom he’s met in his life, not to be maudlin, but to celebrate the wonderful things these people are doing, and to appreciate the chance to be part of their lives, to help them achieve what they truly wanted.

This is a book about childhood dreams. About striving toward them and about what you can gain whether or not you end up achieving those goals. It’s a book about being aware of your life and how you interact with others.

And now that I’ve made it sound like a boring, Hallmark moment, let me tell you Randy Pausch is incredibly articulate and talented at choosing the right illustrations from his own life or from those around him to prove his point. For example, he talks about how he initiated the “First Penguin” award in his labs, not for the group that succeeded, but for the group that fails spectacularly. This example really speaks to me because I’m a largely self-taught programmer, database analyst, systems analyst, and process analyst. Okay, anything logical I’ll tackle and enjoy ;) . Sure, in the end I’ll get things to work, but the way I come to the understanding is by first putting together something that does not. It might not produce any result, might be the wrong result, or maybe it’s just a resource hog. The reality is that with each attempt to accomplish something that fails, I’ve gained a better understanding of the process and how I need to go forward. Each time I think I know the answer and the path leads me to a dead end, I learn about that section of the process and get clues about the overall process so I can set off on another path.

Okay, before I go too far on this tangent, I’ll get to the point. I once worked with a project manager who I enjoyed talking to because he was an interesting man. Out of all our discussions though, the thing that stuck with me so many years later was one time when he mentioned that early in his career he’d been the system administrator for a Novell server. His comment? He’d been responsible for that system for something like five years and still knew little to nothing about it.

At the time, I was hip deep in an aging system that had been pushed well beyond its limits, was leaking data from every crack, and which my team was plastering together with duct tape in the hopes of keeping production rolling long enough for the new system to come into being (which would of course be 10 times better ;) ). What I realized was, rather than cursing the old system under my breath, I should be hugging it. I came out of supporting that system with a clear understanding and direct experience with Unix, Oracle, Unix-Novell bridge solutions, and half a dozen other things. I became a successful programmer and data analyst because of that old system. And when the new one started dribbling data, I didn’t have to learn everything from scratch because those skills I’d honed on the old system were globally applicable. Heck, I still use them in the systems I work with today.

To get back to the book though, that’s only one of the many life lessons he offers that really clicked with me. Randy Pausch’s analysis, in his final months on this Earth, made me sit back and appreciate some of the things I hadn’t given much thought to, people things, computer things, life things. As it turned out, I wasn’t under a death sentence this time at least, and I have more than four months to enjoy the world he’s reminding me of, time he wasn’t given. A lot of what he said wasn’t new to me. I’m prone to self-analysis and so had already come to many of the same conclusions. But this book is a good reminder of things, of making choices and decisions, of not accepting the easy road when your heart craves the harder one, of being there for other people and making their way a bit smoother, and most of all, of seeing the brick walls we face in life not as barriers but as challenges to be conquered.

I have no doubt why this book is a national bestseller, and though it needs no help from me, I suggest you go out and get a copy, whether you buy one, borrow from a friend, or get it from the library. Me? I read my sister’s copy, and there’s a high probability that, when I return it to her, my own copy will nestle in my shelves.